Open Access Journal: Rhea Classical Reviews

Rhea Classical Reviews is predicated on the beliefs that: (1) book reviews should be a constructive, conscientious, and helpful evaluation of the work; (2) the current review model in Classics and related fields does not always prioritize these qualities; (3) emerging and alternative scholars, and particularly individuals within equity-seeking groups, would benefit from a review venue that embraces their contributions as authors and reviewers.

Rhea features reviews written exclusively by emerging or alternative academics: pre-tenure, non-tenure track, or contingent faculty; graduate students; independent scholars; and those with academic training who have chosen a career path adjacent to or outside of academia proper. The books reviewed by Rhea are, with rare exception, also written by such scholars. In addition, Rhea reviews may include a Q&A with the author or editor of the work under review, facilitating a collegial exchange of ideas as part of the review process.

Rhea is a space for emerging and alternative scholars, giving priority to new and underrepresented voices by offering a collaborative model for book reviews in ancient Mediterranean studies.

• • Etruscan Orientalization
  • The House of Serenos, Part I: The Pottery
  • Gaming Greekness
  • Milesian Islands
  • Monsters in Greek Literature

  Archive

  • May 221
  • May 151
  • May 81
  • May 11
  • April 101
  • April 31
  • March 271
  • March 201
  • March 61
  • February 271
  • February 201
  • February 131
  • February 61
  • January 301
  • January 231
  • January 161
  • January 91
  • December 121
  • December 51
  • November 281
  • November 141
  • November 71
  • October 311
  • October 241
  • October 171
  • October 101
  • October 31
  • September 261